🔗 Share this article

US prosecutors have asserted that a Libyan suspect willingly admitted to being involved in operations directed at American targets, comprising the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 incident and an failed plot to kill a US public figure using a explosive-laden garment.

Confession Particulars

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is reported to have admitted his involvement in the killing of 270 people when Pan Am 103 was destroyed over the Scotland's community of the region, during questioning in a Libya's detention facility in the year 2012.

Identified as the suspect, the senior individual has claimed that multiple masked men compelled him to provide the admission after menacing him and his family.

His attorneys are attempting to block it from being utilized as testimony in his legal proceedings in Washington in 2025.

Courtroom Battle

In response, attorneys from the American justice department have stated they can prove in legal proceedings that the admission was "unforced, trustworthy and accurate."

The presence of the suspect's claimed admission was originally revealed in 2020, when the United States declared it was accusing him with creating and activating the explosive device used on Pan Am 103.

Defendant's Assertions

The father-of-six is accused of being a former colonel in Libyan intelligence service and has been in US custody since recent years.

He has entered not guilty to the allegations and is scheduled to appear in court at the US court for the Washington DC in spring.

Mas'ud's attorneys are working to stop the court from learning about the confession and have presented a petition asking for it to be excluded.

They contend it was secured under duress following the uprising which overthrew Colonel Gaddafi in the early 2010s.

Alleged Coercion

They say former members of the dictator's regime were being victimized with unlawful killings, seizures and torture when the defendant was taken from his residence by hostile individuals the following year.

He was moved to an unregistered holding location where additional prisoners were purportedly beaten and harmed and was alone in a small cell when multiple masked men presented him a one sheet of paper.

His legal representatives said its handwritten contents commenced with an instruction that he was to confess to the Pan Am Flight 103 incident and an additional terrorist incident.

Substantial Terror Attacks

Mas'ud asserts he was ordered to memorise what it stated about the events and restate it when he was interviewed by another person the following morning.

Worrying for his well-being and that of his family, he stated he felt he had no option but to acquiesce.

In their reply to the defense's petition, legal counsel from the federal prosecutors have stated the judge was being asked to withhold "highly relevant proof" of the defendant's guilt in "several major extremist events against American people."

Government Responses

They assert the defendant's story of incidents is unconvincing and inaccurate, and argue that the information of the admission can be corroborated by trustworthy independent proof assembled over numerous years.

The government attorneys claim the suspect and fellow previous officials of Gaddafi's intelligence agency were held in a covert holding center operated by a faction when they were interrogated by an experienced Libya's law enforcement official.

They contend that in the disorder of the post-uprising era, the center was "the protected location" for the defendant and the fellow operatives, accounting for the conflict and resistance feeling prevailing at the moment.

Questioning Information

Per to the law enforcement official who interrogated the suspect, the center was "efficiently operated", the detainees were not bound and there were no indications of abuse or coercion.

The official has said that over 48 hours, a confident and well suspect explained his participation in the attacks of Pan Am 103.

The federal authorities has also claimed he had acknowledged constructing a device which detonated in a West Berlin nightclub in the mid-1980s, claiming the lives of multiple people, including multiple US servicemen, and wounding many more.

Further Claims

He is also alleged to have detailed his role in an plot on the safety of an anonymous US diplomatic official at a official ceremony in the Asian country.

Mas'ud is reported to have stated that a person travelling the American politician was bearing a rigged overcoat.

It was the defendant's task to detonate the device but he chose not to act after finding out that the individual wearing the item did not know he was on a fatal assignment.

He chose "not to trigger the device" despite his superior in the agency being present at the time and inquiring what was {going on|happening|occurring